图片说明：示意图
图片来源：Public Domain（公有领域）
关于佩洛西在1月6日所做的事情
西德尼-鲍威尔和斯图-彼得斯讨论了他们认为的真实情况
作者：詹姆斯-萨姆森
9月25日, 2021
【中国观察2021年09月26日讯】
尽管被媒体公开羞辱，并多次在全世界面前被扔到公车上，律师西德尼-鲍威尔仍然决心为唐纳德-特朗普总统和我们所知的美国而战。
在接受我们自己的斯图-彼得斯的采访时，鲍威尔公开了众议院议长南希-佩洛西在1月6日，即国会大厦暴动当天的真实目的。
"据鲍威尔说，就在1月6日那天，有一个最后的法律努力，可能会阻止国会对有争议的选举名单的认证。彼得斯解释说："对《选举计票法》的法律挑战，这是一部有130年历史的法律，管理着实际的选举团程序。"这部法律赋予众议院和参议院在评估选举名单方面的明确职责，尽管宪法第12条修正案只赋予众议院选择总统的职责。参议院只参与选择副总统。"
"因此，鲍威尔提起诉讼以推翻该法律，但在1月6日下午才提出，当时一群人正在国会大厦里践踏，"她补充说。"那场暴乱可能对她有利，因为它推迟了选举的最终决议，但随后南希-佩洛西一举击败了她，重新召开国会并在半夜完成了计票工作。第二天，最高法院法官[Samuel] Alito驳回了此案，但据鲍威尔说，如果不是选举已经结束，情况可能会有所不同"。
鲍威尔本人在接受彼得斯采访时进一步解释了当时的情况。
"我们对国会根据选举法即将使用的程序提出了第12条宪法挑战，这些条款根本不符合美国宪法第12条修正案，"她说。"阿利托法官是我们的巡回法官，路易-戈默特是我们诉讼的原告，我们起诉副总统遵循第12修正案，而不是......选举团法案。"
"因此，这是主要的一点，南希-佩洛西已经骗取了提交一份法庭之友简报，其中有国会的内部活动，据此我相信是史蒂夫-斯卡利斯和[凯文]麦卡锡让她不成为一个实际的当事人，"鲍威尔解释说。"她想以自己的方式进入该党的案件，但在政治上，不知何故，这没有发生。因此，当我们提出申请时，她被注意到了，因为她想提交一份非当事人陈述，或者已经提交了一份非当事人陈述，然后，你知道，一切都崩溃了，她不得不真正加快重新召集国会，在阿利托法官可能发出禁令之前，让投票进行，这本来是应该发生的。"
彼得斯对此回应说，"如果你没有看到隧道的尽头有一线曙光，在这个国家发生问责的隧道，你就不会还在为之奋斗。你必须相信这将会发生，否则你就不会仍然在战斗，是这样吗？"
"它必须发生，否则我们作为一个国家就会消失，"她回答说。"我的意思是，对我来说，这不是关于在总统办公室的那个人。这是关于共和国本身。这是关于美国人民有权获得的真相。他们被剥夺了选择的权利。美国人民在选择总统时被欺骗了，不管他叫什么名字，他们在选择总统时被完全欺骗了。"
"这关系到法治、真相和我们共和国的本质，因为如果没有一个透明的投票系统，坦率地说，自2004年以来，如果不是之前，我们就没有这样的系统，事实上，我们已经发现证据，早在2000年就有欺诈行为，用纸质选票试图把所有人推到电脑系统中，这只会使情况变得更糟，更难发现。"鲍威尔继续说道。"我们必须回到纸质选票。我们必须回到真正的公民身份识别和简单的手工计票。这不那么费时，不那么昂贵，而且比我们刚刚经历的要准确得多。"
西德尼-鲍威尔和斯图-彼得斯讨论了他们认为的真实情况
作者：詹姆斯-萨姆森
9月25日, 2021
【中国观察2021年09月26日讯】
尽管被媒体公开羞辱，并多次在全世界面前被扔到公车上，律师西德尼-鲍威尔仍然决心为唐纳德-特朗普总统和我们所知的美国而战。
在接受我们自己的斯图-彼得斯的采访时，鲍威尔公开了众议院议长南希-佩洛西在1月6日，即国会大厦暴动当天的真实目的。
"据鲍威尔说，就在1月6日那天，有一个最后的法律努力，可能会阻止国会对有争议的选举名单的认证。彼得斯解释说："对《选举计票法》的法律挑战，这是一部有130年历史的法律，管理着实际的选举团程序。"这部法律赋予众议院和参议院在评估选举名单方面的明确职责，尽管宪法第12条修正案只赋予众议院选择总统的职责。参议院只参与选择副总统。"
"因此，鲍威尔提起诉讼以推翻该法律，但在1月6日下午才提出，当时一群人正在国会大厦里践踏，"她补充说。"那场暴乱可能对她有利，因为它推迟了选举的最终决议，但随后南希-佩洛西一举击败了她，重新召开国会并在半夜完成了计票工作。第二天，最高法院法官[Samuel] Alito驳回了此案，但据鲍威尔说，如果不是选举已经结束，情况可能会有所不同"。
鲍威尔本人在接受彼得斯采访时进一步解释了当时的情况。
"我们对国会根据选举法即将使用的程序提出了第12条宪法挑战，这些条款根本不符合美国宪法第12条修正案，"她说。"阿利托法官是我们的巡回法官，路易-戈默特是我们诉讼的原告，我们起诉副总统遵循第12修正案，而不是......选举团法案。"
"因此，这是主要的一点，南希-佩洛西已经骗取了提交一份法庭之友简报，其中有国会的内部活动，据此我相信是史蒂夫-斯卡利斯和[凯文]麦卡锡让她不成为一个实际的当事人，"鲍威尔解释说。"她想以自己的方式进入该党的案件，但在政治上，不知何故，这没有发生。因此，当我们提出申请时，她被注意到了，因为她想提交一份非当事人陈述，或者已经提交了一份非当事人陈述，然后，你知道，一切都崩溃了，她不得不真正加快重新召集国会，在阿利托法官可能发出禁令之前，让投票进行，这本来是应该发生的。"
彼得斯对此回应说，"如果你没有看到隧道的尽头有一线曙光，在这个国家发生问责的隧道，你就不会还在为之奋斗。你必须相信这将会发生，否则你就不会仍然在战斗，是这样吗？"
"它必须发生，否则我们作为一个国家就会消失，"她回答说。"我的意思是，对我来说，这不是关于在总统办公室的那个人。这是关于共和国本身。这是关于美国人民有权获得的真相。他们被剥夺了选择的权利。美国人民在选择总统时被欺骗了，不管他叫什么名字，他们在选择总统时被完全欺骗了。"
"这关系到法治、真相和我们共和国的本质，因为如果没有一个透明的投票系统，坦率地说，自2004年以来，如果不是之前，我们就没有这样的系统，事实上，我们已经发现证据，早在2000年就有欺诈行为，用纸质选票试图把所有人推到电脑系统中，这只会使情况变得更糟，更难发现。"鲍威尔继续说道。"我们必须回到纸质选票。我们必须回到真正的公民身份识别和简单的手工计票。这不那么费时，不那么昂贵，而且比我们刚刚经历的要准确得多。"
"而且我们必须有某种认证的选票系统，就像我们过去也有的那样，没有这种打印你自己的选票，只要你想，把50张专辑塞进一个盒子或什么的，不管是电脑化的还是扎克伯格先生和公司推出的盒子，"她总结说。"其中一个非常令人不安的事情是，媒体与多米尼克公司和这个投票骗局背后的所有人都是一伙的。我认为它比我最初意识到的要广泛和深入得多，包括政府的各个方面。因为他们至少从2004年起就知道这件事，但却没有阻止它，如果不是绝对的扩大化的话。"
这仅仅是鲍威尔所说的开始。在她与彼得斯的完整采访中，可以了解到更多关于此事以及她现在为特朗普和美国所做的斗争。
About What Pelosi Did On January 6
Sidney Powell & Stew Peters discussed what they think really happened
By James Samson
September 25, 2021
Despite being publicly shamed by the media and thrown under the bus repeatedly in front of the entire world, lawyer Sidney Powell is still determined to fight for both President Donald Trump and America as we know it.
In a new interview with our very own Stew Peters, Powell opened up about what Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) was really doing on January 6, the day of the Capitol riot.
“According to Powell, on the very day of January 6, there was one last-ditch legal effort that might have stopped the certification of disputed electoral slates by the Congress: A legal challenge to the Electoral Count Act, a 130-year-old law that governs the actual electoral college process,” Peters explained. “This law gives both the House and Senate explicit roles in evaluating electoral slates, even though the 12th Amendment to the Constitution only gives the House a role in choosing the President. The Senate is only involved in choosing a vice president.”
“So Powell brought a lawsuit to overturn that law but only filed it the afternoon of January 6, while a bunch of people were trampling through the capitol,” he added. “That riot might have played to her advantage by delaying the final resolution of the election, but then Nancy Pelosi one-upped her by reconvening Congress and finishing the tally in the middle of the night. The next day, Supreme Court Justice [Samuel] Alito dismissed the case, but it might have been different according to Powell if the election wasn’t already over.”
Powell herself further explained the situation in her interview with Peters.
“We were filing a 12th amendment constitutional challenge to the process that the Congress was about to use under the electoral act, provisions that simply don’t jive with the 12th Amendment to the United States Constitution,” she stated. “And Justice Alito was our circuit justice for that, Louie Gohmert was the plaintiff in our lawsuit, and we were suing the vice president to follow the 12th Amendment as opposed to the… Electoral College Act.”
“So that was the main point, and Nancy Pelosi had finagled to file an amicus brief in it there have been inside goings-on in Congress, whereby I believe it was Steve Scalise and [Kevin] McCarthy kept her from being an actual party,” Powell explained. “She wanted to work her way into the case of the party, but somehow politically, that didn’t happen. So she got noticed when we made our filing because she wanted to file an amicus brief, or had filed an amicus brief, and then, you know, everything broke loose, and she had to really speed up reconvening Congress to get the vote going before Justice Alito might have issued an injunction to stop at all, which is what should have happened.”
Peters responded to this by saying, “you wouldn’t still be fighting for this if you didn’t see that there was a light at the end of the tunnel, the tunnel for accountability to happen here in this country. And you have to believe that that’s going to happen, or you wouldn’t still be fighting, is that right?”
“It must happen, or we’re gone as a country,” she replied. “I mean, for me, this isn’t about the person that was in the office of the presidency. It’s about the republic itself. It’s about the truth that the American people are entitled to. They were robbed of their choice. The American people were cheated of their choice as President, regardless of what his name was, they were flat out cheated of their choice as President.”
“And it’s about the rule of law, the truth and the very essence of our Republic, because without a transparent voting system, which we haven’t had, frankly, since 2004, if not before, in fact, we’ve uncovered evidence that there was a fraud way back in 2000, with the paper ballots to try to push everyone into the computerized systems, which only made it worse and made it harder to detect,” Powell continued. “We must go back to paper ballots. We must go back to real citizen identification and simply hand counting the ballots. It’s less time-consuming, it’s less expensive, and it’s far more accurate than what we’ve just experienced.”
“And we have to have some kind of certified ballot system like we used to have also, none of this prints your own ballot, whenever you want to and stuff 50 album in a box or whatever, whether it’s computerized or a box put out by Mr. Zuckerberg and company,” she concluded. “One of the very troubling things is that the media is so much in cahoots with Dominion and everyone that’s behind this voting scam. I think it goes much broader and much deeper than I originally realized, including aspects of the government. Because they have known about this since at least 2004 and failed to stop it if not absolutely augmented it themselves.”
This was only the beginning of what Powell had to say. Find out more about this and what she is doing now to fight for Trump and America in her full interview with Peters.
Sidney Powell & Stew Peters discussed what they think really happened
By James Samson
September 25, 2021
Despite being publicly shamed by the media and thrown under the bus repeatedly in front of the entire world, lawyer Sidney Powell is still determined to fight for both President Donald Trump and America as we know it.
In a new interview with our very own Stew Peters, Powell opened up about what Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) was really doing on January 6, the day of the Capitol riot.
“According to Powell, on the very day of January 6, there was one last-ditch legal effort that might have stopped the certification of disputed electoral slates by the Congress: A legal challenge to the Electoral Count Act, a 130-year-old law that governs the actual electoral college process,” Peters explained. “This law gives both the House and Senate explicit roles in evaluating electoral slates, even though the 12th Amendment to the Constitution only gives the House a role in choosing the President. The Senate is only involved in choosing a vice president.”
“So Powell brought a lawsuit to overturn that law but only filed it the afternoon of January 6, while a bunch of people were trampling through the capitol,” he added. “That riot might have played to her advantage by delaying the final resolution of the election, but then Nancy Pelosi one-upped her by reconvening Congress and finishing the tally in the middle of the night. The next day, Supreme Court Justice [Samuel] Alito dismissed the case, but it might have been different according to Powell if the election wasn’t already over.”
Powell herself further explained the situation in her interview with Peters.
“We were filing a 12th amendment constitutional challenge to the process that the Congress was about to use under the electoral act, provisions that simply don’t jive with the 12th Amendment to the United States Constitution,” she stated. “And Justice Alito was our circuit justice for that, Louie Gohmert was the plaintiff in our lawsuit, and we were suing the vice president to follow the 12th Amendment as opposed to the… Electoral College Act.”
“So that was the main point, and Nancy Pelosi had finagled to file an amicus brief in it there have been inside goings-on in Congress, whereby I believe it was Steve Scalise and [Kevin] McCarthy kept her from being an actual party,” Powell explained. “She wanted to work her way into the case of the party, but somehow politically, that didn’t happen. So she got noticed when we made our filing because she wanted to file an amicus brief, or had filed an amicus brief, and then, you know, everything broke loose, and she had to really speed up reconvening Congress to get the vote going before Justice Alito might have issued an injunction to stop at all, which is what should have happened.”
Peters responded to this by saying, “you wouldn’t still be fighting for this if you didn’t see that there was a light at the end of the tunnel, the tunnel for accountability to happen here in this country. And you have to believe that that’s going to happen, or you wouldn’t still be fighting, is that right?”
“It must happen, or we’re gone as a country,” she replied. “I mean, for me, this isn’t about the person that was in the office of the presidency. It’s about the republic itself. It’s about the truth that the American people are entitled to. They were robbed of their choice. The American people were cheated of their choice as President, regardless of what his name was, they were flat out cheated of their choice as President.”
“And it’s about the rule of law, the truth and the very essence of our Republic, because without a transparent voting system, which we haven’t had, frankly, since 2004, if not before, in fact, we’ve uncovered evidence that there was a fraud way back in 2000, with the paper ballots to try to push everyone into the computerized systems, which only made it worse and made it harder to detect,” Powell continued. “We must go back to paper ballots. We must go back to real citizen identification and simply hand counting the ballots. It’s less time-consuming, it’s less expensive, and it’s far more accurate than what we’ve just experienced.”
“And we have to have some kind of certified ballot system like we used to have also, none of this prints your own ballot, whenever you want to and stuff 50 album in a box or whatever, whether it’s computerized or a box put out by Mr. Zuckerberg and company,” she concluded. “One of the very troubling things is that the media is so much in cahoots with Dominion and everyone that’s behind this voting scam. I think it goes much broader and much deeper than I originally realized, including aspects of the government. Because they have known about this since at least 2004 and failed to stop it if not absolutely augmented it themselves.”
This was only the beginning of what Powell had to say. Find out more about this and what she is doing now to fight for Trump and America in her full interview with Peters.
喜欢这篇报道？
使用下面的功能，方便以后继续阅读和分享 MNewsTV
关于文章收藏
收藏不需要注册帐号，收藏信息仅保存在当前浏览器中。
删除收藏请进入「我的收藏」进行管理。